Skip to main content

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Functional Outcome Measure: Change in Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients

CBE ID
2633
Endorsement Status
E&M Committee Rationale/Justification

Steward no longer seeking to maintain endorsement

1.1 New or Maintenance
Previous Endorsement Cycle
Is Under Review
No
1.3 Measure Description

This measure estimates the risk-adjusted mean change in self-care score between admission and discharge for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Medicare Part A and Medicare Advantage patients.

        • 1.5 Measure Type
          1.7 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM)
          1.8 Level Of Analysis
        • 1.14 Numerator

          The measure does not have a simple form for the numerator and denominator. This measure estimates the risk-adjusted change in self-care score between admission and discharge among Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Medicare Part A and Medicare Advantage patients age 21 or older. The change in self-care score is calculated as the difference between the discharge self-care score and the admission self-care score.

        • 1.15 Denominator

          The denominator is the number of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Medicare patient stays, except those that meet the exclusion criteria.

        • Exclusions

          This quality measure has six patient-level exclusion criteria:

          1) Patients with incomplete stays.
          Rationale: When a patient has an incomplete stay, for example, the patients leave urgently due to a medical emergency, it can be challenging to gather accurate discharge functional status data. Patients with incomplete stays include patients who are unexpectedly discharged to an acute care setting (Short-stay Acute Hospital, Critical Access Hospital, Inpatient Psychiatric Facility, or Long-term Care Hospital); patients who die or leave an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) against medical advice; and patients with a length of stay less than 3 days.

          2) Patients who are independent with all self-care activities at the time of admission.
          Rationale: Patients who are independent with all the self-care items at the time of admission are assigned the highest score on all the self-care items, and thus, would not be able to show functional improvement on this same set of items at discharge.

          3) Patients with the following medical conditions on admission: coma; persistent vegetative state; complete quadriplegia; locked-in syndrome; or severe anoxic brain damage, cerebral edema or compression of the brain.
          Rationale: These patients are excluded because they may have limited or less predictable self-care improvement with the selected self-care items.

          4) Patients younger than age 21.
          Rationale: There is only limited evidence published about functional outcomes for individuals with Medicare who are younger than 21.

          5) Patients discharged to Hospice.
          Rationale: Patient goals may change during the IRF stay, and functional improvement may no longer be a goal for a patient discharged to hospice.

          6) Patients who are not Medicare Part A and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.
          Rationale: IRF-PAI data for patients not covered by the Medicare program are not submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

          Facility-level quality measure exclusion: For IRFs with fewer than 20 patient stays, data for this quality measure are not publicly reported.

        • 1.13a Data dictionary not attached
          No
        • Most Recent Endorsement Activity
          Endorsed Patient Experience and Function Spring Cycle 2019
          Initial Endorsement
          Last Updated
          Removal Date
        • Steward
          Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
          Steward Organization POC Email
          Steward Organization Copyright

          Not applicable

              • Risk Adjustment
                Risk adjustment approach
                Off
                Risk adjustment approach
                Off
                Conceptual model for risk adjustment
                Off
                Conceptual model for risk adjustment
                Off