Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Electronic Health Records

Valid for Measure Submission

30-Day Post-Operative Colon Surgery (COLO) and Abdominal Hysterectomy (HYST) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR)

CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
00001-02-C-PCHQR
Steward Organization Group
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Committee
MSR Recommendation Group
    Measure Overview
      Use in CMS Programs
      CMS Program History
      • Finalized for inclusion in the PCHQR Program in 2013.
      • Implemented in the PCHQR Program in 2014. 
      Description

      Annual risk-adjusted standardized infection ratio (SIR) of observed over predicted deep incisional primary and organ/space surgical site infections (SSIs), over a 30-day post-operative surveillance period, among hospitalized adults who are >=18 year of age with a date of admission and date of discharge that are different calendar days, and the patient underwent a colon surgery (COLO) or abdominal hysterectomy (HYST) at an acute care hospital or oncology hospital.  The 30-day postoperative surveillance period includes SSIs detected upon admission to the facility or a readmission to the same facility or a different facility (other than where the procedure was performed) and via post-discharge surveillance.

      Numerator

      Number of annually observed hospitalized patients who are >=18 years of age with a date of admission and date of discharge that are different calendar days, and the patient underwent a colon surgery (COLO) or abdominal hysterectomy (HYST) and developed a deep incisional primary or organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) within the 30-day postoperative surveillance period.  The 30-day postoperative surveillance period includes SSIs detected upon admission to the facility or a readmission to the same facility or a different facility (other than where the procedure was performed) and via post-discharge surveillance.

      Numerator Exclusions

      N/A

      Numerator Exceptions

      N/A

      Denominator

      Number of annually predicted hospitalized patients who are >=18 years of age with a date of admission and date of discharge are different calendar days, and the patient underwent a colon surgery (COLO) or abdominal hysterectomy (HYST)  and developed a deep incisional primary or organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) within the 30-day post-operative surveillance period. The 30-day postoperative surveillance period includes SSIs detected upon admission to the facility or a readmission to the same facility or a different facility (other than where the procedure was performed) and via post-discharge surveillance.

      Denominator Exclusions
      • Procedures that develop a postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) and the infection is present at the time of surgery (PATOS), the SSI event and surgical procedure are excluded  
      • ASA class VI 
      • Patients whose admission date and discharge date are the same day.  
      • Patients <18 years of age 
      • Patients >= 109 years of age 
      • Adult patients, >=18 years of age, BMI is less than 12 or greater than 60 
      • Procedures reported in patients with sex reported as Other are excluded from the SSI SIR  
      • Surgical procedure duration less than 5 minutes or exceeding the IQR5 value 
      Denominator Exceptions

      N/A

      Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
      Measure Type
      Outcome
      Level of Analysis
      Facility
      Care Setting
      PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital
      Hospital: Inpatient
      Hospital: Outpatient
      CBE Endorsement Status
      Endorsed
      CBE Endorsement History

      Endorsement History: Endorsed with conditions in 2012 and endorsement retained during maintenance review in 2025. 

      Link to Endorsement Measure Record: 30-Day Post-Operative Colon Surgery (COLO) and Abdominal Hysterectomy (HYST) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR)

        About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

        Impact Summary: This measure supports the PCHQR Program’s objectives by providing transparent, standardized infection ratio data that empowers consumers to make informed health care decisions and motivates hospitals and clinicians to focus on quality improvement and adherence to best practices in inpatient care for Medicare beneficiaries. 

        Analysis of measure performance over the past 4 years is impacted by the small number of PCHQR hospitals available to report on this measure, rather than low participation among a large eligible group. 

        With only seven entities per year in Figure 1a and eight in Figure 1b, distinguishing true trends from random variation is difficult, and little discernable change is observed across the 4 years. Tables 1a and 1b demonstrate potential improvements that translate to a reduction in surgical site infections of fewer than three eligible patients per entity.

        For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets available at Hospitals data archive | Provider Data Catalog:

        • Hospitals_02_2026.zip (which contains data from April 2024-March 2025 and is referred to as year 2024 in this assessment)
        • Hospitals_02_2025.zip (which contains data from April 2023-March 2024 and is referred to as year 2023 in this assessment)
        • Hospitals_01_2024.zip (which contains data from April 2022-March 2023 and is referred to as year 2022 in this assessment)
        • Hospitals_01_2023.zip (which contains data from April 2021-March 2022 and is referred to as year 2021 in this assessment)

        Battelle analyzed all values for “PCH_6” and “PCH_7” not marked as “Not Available” from the corresponding PCH_HEALTHCARE_ASSOCIATED_INFECTIONS_HOSPITAL.csv file.

         

        About Figure 1a and 1b: Figures 1a and 1b are boxplots that show how scores have changed based on the most recent 4 years of data available. For each year, the boxplot displays a box with lines and dots to help visualize the range and distribution of scores. The dots represent the points where the lowest 5% and highest 5% of scores fall, and the line connecting them shows where 90% of the scores are located. The box itself covers the middle half of the scores, from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Inside the box, a horizontal line marks the median score, which is the middle value, while a “+” sign shows the average score. This type of graph makes overall trends in scores over time as well as the consistency and spread of the results easier to understand.

        Figure 1 (Measure Score by PY)
        boxplot

        Figure 1a. Boxplot of Measure Score by Year (Colon Surgery)

         

        Figure 1b. Boxplot of Measure Score by Year (Abdominal Hysterectomy)

        Interpretation (Measure Score by PY)

        Figure 1a and 1b Interpretation: In Figure 1a, each year includes data from only seven entities, while Figure 1b includes eight entities per year. Because of this small sample size, any trends observed over the 4 years could be due to random variation rather than meaningful change. Overall, the limited number of PPS-exempt cancer hospitals participating and reporting in this program makes analyzing overall performance trends difficult. For this measure, lower scores reflect higher quality of care.

        About this Analysis (Score Distro)

        About Table 1a and 1b: Tables 1a and 1b illustrate the distribution of scores (SIRs), raw rates, and the number of patients represented within each entity. It is important to note that the entities with the lowest or highest scores may contain more or fewer patients than other entities. For example, if the lowest-scoring entity includes only 5% of the total patient population, then smaller entity size may be associated with lower performance scores.

        Table 1 (Score Distro)

        Table 1a. Importance (Entity by Measure Score, FY2024) Colon Surgery in the Most Recent Year of Data Available

         OverallEntity 1Entity 2Entity 3Entity 4Entity 5Entity 6Entity 7
        Average SIR (Standard Deviation)0.764 (0.184)0.5740.5520.6440.7320.9070.9510.991
        Average Raw Rate (Standard Deviation) 3.55 (0.82)2.682.683.083.214.224.474.50
        Entities71111111
        Patients3,8404867844554672841,164200

         

        Table 1b. Importance (Entity by Measure Score, FY2024) Abdominal Hysterectomy in the Most Recent Year of Data Available

         OverallEntity 1Entity 2Entity 3Entity 4Entity 5Entity 6Entity 7Entity 8
        Average SIR (Standard Deviation)0.471 (0.231)N/A0.2570.2600.3180.4230.5930.5470.898
        Average Raw Rate (Standard Deviation) 0.599 (0.388)00.3760.3880.4460.6310.8260.8401.283
        Entities811111111
        Patients2,56132662582243172422381,013



         

        Interpretation (Score Distro)

        Table 1a and Table 1b Interpretation: Note that there are data for only seven entities for Table 1a and eight entities for Table 1b. To estimate the number of negative outcomes (surgical site infections), the number of patients is multiplied by the average raw rate for each entity. 

         

        The total estimated number of negative outcomes across all entities for Table 1a is about 140. If the average performance of the lowest two entities (2.68%) is considered a plausible, achievable rate, and the other five entities improved to reach that rate, about 30 fewer colon surgery patients would experience surgical site infections. This translates to about four patients per entity and could mean that improving performance on this measure could help ensure that fewer colon surgery patients would contract surgical site infections, potentially leading to better health outcomes. 

         

        The total estimated number of negative outcomes (surgical site infections) across all entities for Table 1b is about 22. If all entities reduced the rate to 0%, 22 fewer abdominal hysterectomy patients would experience surgical site infections. This translates to less than three eligible patients per entity. 

          Importance Criterion Definition

          The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

            Criterion Definition

            This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

              Criterion Definition

              This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

              PA Type
              Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)

              30-Day Post-Operative Colon Surgery (COLO) and Abdominal Hysterectomy (HYST) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR)

              Annual risk-adjusted standardized infection ratio (SIR) of observed over predicted deep incisional primary and organ/space surgical site infections (SSIs), over a 30-day post-operative surveillance period, among hospitalized adults who are >=18 year of age with a date of admission and date of discharge that are different calendar days, and the patient underwent a colon surgery (COLO) or abdominal hysterectomy (HYST) at an acute care hospital or oncology hospital.  The 30-day postoperative surveillance period includes SSIs detected upon admission to the facility or a readmission to t

              CBE ID
              0753

              Adult Community-Onset (CO) Sepsis Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR)

              Annual risk-adjusted standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of adult inpatients with community-onset sepsis who died during their hospitalization or were discharged to hospice. SMR is reported annually and is calculated by dividing the number of observed community-onset sepsis deaths by the number of predicted community-onset sepsis deaths. 

              Advance Care Planning (ACP)

              Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older at the start of the measurement period with one or more inpatient encounters during the measurement period who have an advance care planning document or documentation of an advance care planning discussion resulting in a documented decision in the electronic health record (EHR) by the time of hospital discharge for at least one hospital encounter during the measurement period.  

              Ambulatory Palliative Care Patients’ Experience of Feeling Heard and Understood

              This is a multi-item measure consisting of 4 items: Q1: “I felt heard and understood by this provider and team”, Q2: “I felt this provider and team put my best interests first when making recommendations about my care”, Q3: “I felt this provider and team saw me as a person, not just someone with a medical problem”, Q4: “I felt this provider and team understood what is important to me in my life.”

              CBE ID
              3665

              Bloodstream Infection in Hemodialysis Outpatients

              Annual standardized infection ratio (SIR) of bloodstream infections (BSIs) among children and adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis at outpatient hemodialysis facilities. BSIs are defined as positive blood cultures for hemodialysis patients which are reported monthly by participating facilities. The SIR is reported for a yearly period (calendar year) and is calculated by dividing the number of observed BSIs by the number of predicted BSIs during the year.

              CBE ID
              1460

              Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Standardized Infection Ratio

              CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
              00459-01-C-IRFQR
              Steward Organization Group
              Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
              Committee
              MSR Recommendation Group
                Measure Overview
                  Use in CMS Programs
                  CMS Program History
                  • Finalized for inclusion in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting program in 2012. 
                  • Implemented in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting program in 2014.
                  • Also active in the Long-Term Care (LTC) Hospital Quality Reporting program and the PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program. 
                  Description

                  Annual risk-adjusted standardized infection ratio (SIR) of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) among adults and children hospitalized as inpatients at acute care hospitals, critical access hospitals, oncology hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals, and acute care rehabilitation hospitals. SIR is reported annually and is calculated by dividing the number of observed CAUTIs by the number of predicted CAUTIs.   

                  Numerator

                  Number of annually observed catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) in hospital inpatients.

                  Numerator Exclusions

                  N/A

                  Numerator Exceptions

                  N/A

                  Denominator

                  The denominator for both the SIR and the ARM is the total number of predicted CAUTI during hospitalization for patients within the unit of study (i.e., location under surveillance). The predicted number of infections for a facility is calculated based on the reported number of catheter days at the location-level using a negative binomial regression that accounts for the following risk factors:

                  ACHs: CDC-defined location within a facility (e.g., critical ICUs, SCAs, step-down units, etc.), bed size, medical school affiliation, and facility type

                  CAHs: medical school affiliation

                  IRFs: setting type, proportion of admissions with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, proportion of admissions with stroke

                  LTACHs: average length of stay, setting type, and location type.

                  Denominator Exclusions

                  The following are not considered indwelling catheters by NHSN definitions:

                  • Suprapubic catheters
                  • Condom catheters
                  • “In and out” catheterizations
                  • Nephrostomy tubes
                  • Ileoconduits 
                  Denominator Exceptions

                  N/A

                  Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                  Measure Type
                  Outcome
                  Level of Analysis
                  Facility
                  Care Setting
                  Hospital: Inpatient Acute Care Facility
                  PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital
                  Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility
                  Long-Term Acute Care Facility
                  CBE Endorsement Status
                  Endorsed with Conditions
                  CBE Endorsement History

                  Endorsement History: 

                  • Initial endorsement, 2012.
                  • New measure endorsed with conditions Spring 2025.

                  Link to Endorsement Measure Record: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Outcome Measure

                    About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                    Impact Summary: This measure supports the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program by assessing health care-associated catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) among patients in bedded inpatient rehabilitation facilities, an outcome directly associated with patient safety and quality of care. 

                    Based on the most recent data, the total estimated number of CAUTIs across all deciles is approximately 1,400. If inpatient rehabilitation facilities with higher CAUTI rates improved their performance to levels observed among better-performing facilities, the analysis suggests that up to about 1,400 CAUTIs could potentially be avoided, indicating a substantial opportunity for improved patient outcomes.

                    For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets available at Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data | Provider Data Catalog (cms.gov):

                    • Inpatient_rehabilitation_facilities_03_2026.zip (which contains data from April 2024-March 2025 and is referred to as year 2024 in this assessment)
                    • Inpatient_rehabilitation_facilities_03_2025.zip (which contains data from April 2023-March 2024 and is referred to as year 2023 in this assessment)
                    • Inpatient_rehabilitation_facilities_03_2024.zip (which contains data from April 2022-March 2023 and is referred to as year 2022 in this assessment)
                    • Inpatient_rehabilitation_facilities_03_2023.zip (which contains data from April 2021-March 2022 and is referred to as year 2021 in this assessment)

                    Battelle analyzed all values for “I_006_01” not marked as “Not Available” from the corresponding Inpatient_Rehabilitation_Facility-Provider_Data.csv file.

                     

                    About Figure 1: Figure 1 is a boxplot that shows how scores have changed based on the most recent 4 years of data available. For each year, the boxplot displays a box with lines and dots to help visualize the range and distribution of scores. The dots represent the points where the lowest 5% and highest 5% of scores fall, and the line connecting them shows where 90% of the scores are located. The box itself covers the middle half of the scores, from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Inside the box, a horizontal line marks the median score, which is the middle value, while a “+” sign shows the average score. This type of graph makes overall trends in scores over time as well as the consistency and spread of the results easier to understand.

                    Figure 1 (Measure Score by PY)
                    boxplot

                     

                    Figure 1. Boxplot of Measure Score by Year

                    Interpretation (Measure Score by PY)

                    Figure 1 Interpretation: There is no discernible change across the 4 years. For this measure, a lower score indicates better quality of care.

                    About this Analysis (Score Distro)

                    About Table 1: Table 1 illustrates the distribution of scores and the number of patients represented within each group. It is important to note that the groups (referred to as deciles, each comprising 10% of the organizations) with the lowest or highest scores may contain more or fewer patients than other groups. For example, if the lowest-scoring decile includes only 5% of the total patient population, this smaller group size may be associated with lower performance scores.

                    Table 1 (Score Distro)

                    Table 1. Importance in the Most Recent Year of Data Available (Decile by Measure Score, FY2024) 

                     OverallDecile 1Decile 2Decile 3Decile 4Decile 5Decile 6Decile 7Decile 8Decile 9Decile 10
                    Average SIR (Standard Deviation)

                    1.060 (1.089)

                    0

                    0

                    0

                    0

                    0.117

                    0.688

                    1.142

                    1.706

                    2.326

                    3.562

                    Average Raw Rate (Standard Deviation)

                    0.200 (0.328)

                    0

                    0

                    0

                    0

                    0.006

                    0.099

                    0.194

                    0.291

                    0.450

                    0.957

                    Entities

                    1,123

                    113

                    112

                    112

                    113

                    112

                    112

                    113

                    112

                    112

                    112

                    Patients

                    790,630

                    50,594

                    48,918

                    58,134

                    49,690

                    77,282

                    167,930

                    116,230

                    100,352

                    82,073

                    39,427

                    Interpretation (Score Distro)

                    Table 1 Interpretation: To estimate the number of negative outcomes (CAUTIs), the number of patients is multiplied by the average raw rate for each decile. Right now, the total estimated number of negative outcomes across all deciles is about 1,400. If the average performance of Decile 3 (0%) is considered a plausible, achievable score, and the entities in Deciles 4 through 10 improved to reach that score, about 1,400 fewer measured patients would contract CAUTIs. This translates to about one patient per entity.

                      Importance Criterion Definition

                      The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                        Criterion Definition

                        This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                          Criterion Definition

                          This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                          PA Type
                          Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)