Skip to main content

CVD Risk Assessment Measure – Proportion of Pregnant/Postpartum Patients That Receive CVD Risk Assessment with a Standardized Tool

CBE ID
3716
Endorsed
New or Maintenance
Is Under Review
No
E&M Cycle Comments

Effective March 27, 2023, the National Quality Forum (NQF) is no longer the consensus-based entity (CBE) funded through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) National Consensus Development and Strategic Planning for Health Care Quality Measurement Contract. Battelle has been selected to oversee the endorsement & maintenance (E&M) of clinical quality and cost/resource use measures. Since the Fall 2022 cycle launched at NQF, measures submitted to this E&M cycle continued along the prior E&M protocols that were in place at time of the Fall 2022 “Intent to Submit.” Battelle took over the E&M work for the Fall 2022 cycle after developers and/or stewards submitted their full measure information to NQF, which for CBE #3716, the most recent measure specifications can be found here: https://p4qm.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/3716.zip

Battelle took over the E&M work beginning with the public comment period to close the E&M committees for the post-comment meeting, convening the CSAC to render a final endorsement decision, and executing the appeals period.

 

Measure Description
The University of California, Irvine (UCI) implemented and tested a CVD risk assessment algorithm that can be integrated into the electronic health record (EHR) system that immediately identifies patients who are at increased risk for CVD. The unit of measurement is individual patients, and the population will include any patient who has a prenatal or postpartum visit in the hospital system. This includes pregnant and postpartum emancipated minors. The denominator in the CVD Risk Assessment Measure is all patients seen for pregnancy or postpartum care at a health care facility or hospital system. A hospital system includes Labor and Delivery (L & D), outpatient care in hospitals or at affiliated clinics, and private providers contracted with hospitals for delivery. The measure excludes patients with a preexisting heart problem, and patients who have another reason for visiting a clinic [not prenatal or postpartum care] and have a positive pregnancy test but plan to terminate the pregnancy or seek prenatal services elsewhere. This measure determines the percentage of pregnant or postpartum patients at a clinic who were assessed for CVD risk with a standardized tool, such as the CVD risk assessment algorithm developed by the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC). The aim is to perform a CVD risk assessment using a standardized tool on all (100 %) eligible pregnant/postpartum patients. Every single patient should be assessed for CVD risk at least once during their pregnancy and, if needed, additional times when new symptoms present during the pregnancy and/or postpartum period. A threshold has still to be determined (“at least xxx % of patients who received risk assessment”). The measure can be calculated on a quarterly or annual basis.
  • Measure Type
    MAT output not attached
    Attached
    Data dictionary not attached
    No
    Numerator

    The percentage of all pregnant and postpartum patients who received a CVD risk assessment with a standardized tool.

    Denominator

    Pregnant and Postpartum Office visit assess the CVD risk of patients who are pregnant or postpartum (group B “Pregnant and Postpartum Office Visit” in the CPT-ICD 10 Code Book). Any person who is pregnant or postpartum who attends a pregnant or postpartum clinic visit at any participating site should undergo risk assessment. See the excel attachment “CPT – ICD 10 Code Book” for the full list of CVD confirmation CPT codes.

    All information required to stratify the measure results
    Off
    All information required to stratify the measure results
    Off
  • Risk adjustment approach
    Off
    Risk adjustment approach
    Off
    Conceptual model for risk adjustment
    Off
    Conceptual model for risk adjustment
    Off
  • Most Recent Endorsement Activity
    Not Endorsed Cardiovascular Fall 2022
    Initial Endorsement
    Next Planned Maintenance Review
    Fall 2027
    Endorsement Status
    Last Updated
  • Do you have a secondary measure developer point of contact?
    Off
    Measure Developer Secondary Point Of Contact

    United States

    The measure developer is NOT the same as measure steward
    Off
    Steward Organization Email
    Steward Address

    United States

  • Detailed Measure Specifications
    No
    Logic Model
    Off
    Impact and Gap
    No
    Feasibility assessment methodology and results
    No
    Address health equity
    No
    Measure’s use or intended use
    No
    508 Compliance
    Off
    If no, attest that all information will be provided in other fields in the submission.
    Off