Skip to main content

CVD Risk Assessment Measure – Proportion of Pregnant/Postpartum Patients That Receive CVD Risk Assessment with a Standardized Tool

CBE ID
3716
Endorsed
Endorsement Status
1.1 New or Maintenance
E&M Cycle
Is Under Review
No
Next Planned Maintenance Review
Fall 2027
E&M Cycle Comments

Effective March 27, 2023, the National Quality Forum (NQF) is no longer the consensus-based entity (CBE) funded through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) National Consensus Development and Strategic Planning for Health Care Quality Measurement Contract. Battelle has been selected to oversee the endorsement & maintenance (E&M) of clinical quality and cost/resource use measures. Since the Fall 2022 cycle launched at NQF, measures submitted to this E&M cycle continued along the prior E&M protocols that were in place at time of the Fall 2022 “Intent to Submit.” Battelle took over the E&M work for the Fall 2022 cycle after developers and/or stewards submitted their full measure information to NQF, which for CBE #3716, the most recent measure specifications can be found here: https://p4qm.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/3716.zip

Battelle took over the E&M work beginning with the public comment period to close the E&M committees for the post-comment meeting, convening the CSAC to render a final endorsement decision, and executing the appeals period.

 

1.3 Measure Description
The University of California, Irvine (UCI) implemented and tested a CVD risk assessment algorithm that can be integrated into the electronic health record (EHR) system that immediately identifies patients who are at increased risk for CVD. The unit of measurement is individual patients, and the population will include any patient who has a prenatal or postpartum visit in the hospital system. This includes pregnant and postpartum emancipated minors. The denominator in the CVD Risk Assessment Measure is all patients seen for pregnancy or postpartum care at a health care facility or hospital system. A hospital system includes Labor and Delivery (L & D), outpatient care in hospitals or at affiliated clinics, and private providers contracted with hospitals for delivery. The measure excludes patients with a preexisting heart problem, and patients who have another reason for visiting a clinic [not prenatal or postpartum care] and have a positive pregnancy test but plan to terminate the pregnancy or seek prenatal services elsewhere. This measure determines the percentage of pregnant or postpartum patients at a clinic who were assessed for CVD risk with a standardized tool, such as the CVD risk assessment algorithm developed by the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC). The aim is to perform a CVD risk assessment using a standardized tool on all (100 %) eligible pregnant/postpartum patients. Every single patient should be assessed for CVD risk at least once during their pregnancy and, if needed, additional times when new symptoms present during the pregnancy and/or postpartum period. A threshold has still to be determined (“at least xxx % of patients who received risk assessment”). The measure can be calculated on a quarterly or annual basis.
        • 1.5 Measure Type
        • 1.14 Numerator

          The percentage of all pregnant and postpartum patients who received a CVD risk assessment with a standardized tool.

        • 1.15 Denominator

          Pregnant and Postpartum Office visit assess the CVD risk of patients who are pregnant or postpartum (group B “Pregnant and Postpartum Office Visit” in the CPT-ICD 10 Code Book). Any person who is pregnant or postpartum who attends a pregnant or postpartum clinic visit at any participating site should undergo risk assessment. See the excel attachment “CPT – ICD 10 Code Book” for the full list of CVD confirmation CPT codes.

        • 1.13a Data dictionary not attached
          No
          OLD 1.12 MAT output not attached
          Attached
        • Most Recent Endorsement Activity
          Not Endorsed Cardiovascular Fall 2022
          Initial Endorsement
          Last Updated
              • Risk adjustment approach
                Off
                Risk adjustment approach
                Off
                Conceptual model for risk adjustment
                Off
                Conceptual model for risk adjustment
                Off