Skip to main content

CVD Risk Follow-up Measure - Proportion of patients with a positive CVD risk assessment who receive follow-up care

CBE ID
3735
Endorsed
Endorsement Status
1.1 New or Maintenance
E&M Cycle
Is Under Review
No
Next Planned Maintenance Review
Fall 2027
E&M Cycle Comments

Effective March 27, 2023, the National Quality Forum (NQF) is no longer the consensus-based entity (CBE) funded through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) National Consensus Development and Strategic Planning for Health Care Quality Measurement Contract. Battelle has been selected to oversee the endorsement & maintenance (E&M) of clinical quality and cost/resource use measures. Since the Fall 2022 cycle launched at NQF, measures submitted to this E&M cycle continued along the prior E&M protocols that were in place at time of the Fall 2022 “Intent to Submit.” Battelle took over the E&M work for the Fall 2022 cycle after developers and/or stewards submitted their full measure information to NQF, which for CBE #3735, the most recent measure specifications can be found here: https://p4qm.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/3735.zip

Battelle took over the E&M work beginning with the public comment period to close the E&M committees for the post-comment meeting, convening the CSAC to render a final endorsement decision, and executing the appeals period.

1.3 Measure Description
All pregnant and postpartum patients need to be systematically assessed for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Once identified as being at risk for CVD follow-up cardiac tests and consultations are scheduled. UCI implemented and tested a standardized CVD risk assessment algorithm that can be integrated into the EHR system and provides an immediate triage of patients as low and high risk for CVD. This measure assesses the rate of pregnant and postpartum patients who are determined to be at risk for CVD) using a standardized risk assessment who received appropriate follow-up in the form of cardiology consultations and tests. The unit of measurement is the individual patient, and the population is comprised of patients who have an outpatient or inpatient prenatal or postpartum visit at a clinic or facility. This includes pregnant and postpartum emancipated minors. The measure can be calculated at the hospital system level or clinic site level. A hospital system includes Labor and Delivery, outpatient care in a hospital or at affiliated clinics, and private providers contracted with the hospital for delivery. The denominator of the measure is comprised of all patients seen for prenatal or postpartum care at the measurement entity (hospital system or individual clinic sites) who were identified as “at risk for CVD” in a standardized CVD risk assessment such as the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) CVD risk assessment algorithm. The aim is to have 100 percent of patients with a positive risk assessment receiving follow-up as recommended by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines. Implementation of the tool in three hospital systems showed a wide variation in the rate of follow-up between 38.4% and 70.8% of patients identified as high risk for CVD. The measure can be calculated annually.
        • 1.5 Measure Type
        • 1.14 Numerator

          Patients who were identified to be at risk for CVD and received follow-up care within 60 days of the risk.

        • 1.15 Denominator

          Pregnant and postpartum patients who have been identified to be at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) during the measurement period. Patients who were screened for CVD and had a pregnancy loss or stillbirth will remain in the cohort.

        • 1.13a Data dictionary not attached
          No
          OLD 1.12 MAT output not attached
          Attached
        • Most Recent Endorsement Activity
          Not Endorsed Cardiovascular Fall 2022
          Initial Endorsement
          Last Updated
              • Risk adjustment approach
                Off
                Risk adjustment approach
                Off
                Conceptual model for risk adjustment
                Off
                Conceptual model for risk adjustment
                Off