Skip to main content

Hospital-Wide 30-Day, All-Cause, Unplanned Readmission Rate (HWR) for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Eligible Clinician Groups

CBE ID
3495
Endorsement Status
E&M Committee Rationale/Justification

When the measure returns for maintenance, the committee would like to see: 

  • Explore systemic differences in ED admission/readmission rates and the potential impact on the clinician-group’s ability to improve
1.0 New or Maintenance
Previous Endorsement Cycle
Is Under Review
No
Next Maintenance Cycle
Spring 2029
1.6 Measure Description

The 30-day Hospital-Wide, All-Cause Unplanned Readmission (HWR) Rate for the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Groups measure is a risk-standardized readmission rate for beneficiaries age 65 or older who were hospitalized and experienced an unplanned readmission for any cause to a short-stay acute-care hospital within 30 days of discharge. The measure attributes readmissions to up to three MIPS participating clinician groups, as identified by their Medicare Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), and assesses each group’s readmission rate. The measure reports a single summary risk-adjusted readmission rate (RARR) derived from the volume-weighted results of 5 different models, one for each of the following specialty cohorts based on groups of discharge condition categories or procedure categories: surgery/gynecology; general medicine; cardiorespiratory; cardiovascular; and neurology, each of which will be described in greater detail below. This re-specified clinician group measure replaced the All-Cause Readmission (ACR) measure previously used in the Quality Payment Program (QPP).

Measure Specs
General Information
1.7 Measure Type
1.7 Composite Measure
No
1.3 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM)
1.8 Level of Analysis
1.10 Measure Rationale

The Hospital-Wide 30-Day, All-Cause, Unplanned Readmission Rate for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Eligible Clinician Group (MIPS HWR) measure addresses unplanned readmissions at the clinician group level for Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) beneficiaries aged 65 or older. The measure is risk adjusted and based on administrative claims. This measure is a re-specified version of the hospital-level measure, Hospital-Wide All-Cause, Unplanned Readmission (consensus-based entity [CBE] #1789) and related to the Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause, Unplanned Readmission measure (CBE #2879e) that is under review in this same endorsement cycle (Spring 2024). The MIPS HWR measure has the same cohort, outcome, and claims-based risk variables as CBE #2879e and promotes a systems-level approach by clinicians and a focus on high-risk conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure. 

 

Hospital readmission, for any reason, is disruptive to patients and caregivers, costly to the healthcare system, and puts patients at additional risk of hospital-acquired infections and complications. In 2018, there were 3.8 million readmissions with an average cost of $15,200, or a total projected cost of about $58 billion (Weiss & Jiang, 2021). Readmissions are also a major source of patient and family stress and may contribute substantially to loss of functional ability, particularly in older patients. 

 

Some readmissions are unavoidable, but others may result from poor quality of care, inadequate coordination of care, or lack of effective discharge planning and transitional care. Interventions aimed at improving care at discharge, including improving communication, medication reconciliation, and ensuring timely follow up following discharge, have been shown to be effective at reducing readmission rates (Becker et al., 2021; Morkisch et al., 2020; Kripalani et al., 2014; De Oliveira et al., 2021; Anderson et al., 2022). (Please see section 6.2 for a discussion of interventions to reduce readmissions.)

 

There has been a nation-wide focus on reducing post-discharge readmissions for many years, and while progress has been made, the overall national readmission rate remains high, with a 30-day readmission ranging from 11 percent of admission for surgery/gynecology, to 17 percent for cardiovascular admissions (based on CMS data in FFS patients between July 1, 2022-June 30, 2023). Furthermore, readmission rates vary widely across institutions and clinician groups (risk-standardized 30-day readmission rates for more than 97,000 clinician groups ranged from about 9 percent to 27 percent with recent data). Both the high baseline rate and the variability across institutions speak to the need for a quality measure to prompt more concerted and widespread action. 

 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is applying this measure to MIPS and continuing to attribute outcomes to clinician groups, because reducing avoidable readmissions is a key component in the effort to promote more efficient, high-quality care. Physician groups have the capability to influence unplanned readmission outcomes through interventions such as appropriate medication reconciliation at discharge, reduction of infection risk, and ensuring proper outpatient follow-up. Current performance on this measure indicates a substantial need to reduce the expected rate and reduce variation across eligible physician groups. As an administrative claims measure, there is no separate reporting burden. 

 

References

Anderson, A., Mills, C. W., Willits, J., Lisk, C., Maksut, J. L., Khau, M. T., & Scholle, S. H. (2022). Follow-up Post-discharge and Readmission Disparities Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries, 2018. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(12), 3020–3028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07488-3

Becker, C., Zumbrunn, S., Beck, K., Vincent, A., Loretz, N., Müller, J., Amacher, S. A., Schaefert, R., & Hunziker, S. (2021). Interventions to Improve Communication at Hospital Discharge and Rates of Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA network open, 4(8), e2119346. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19346

De Oliveira G, Castro-Alves L, Kendall M, McCarthy R. Effectiveness of Pharmacist Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors and Health-Care Resources Utilization After Transitions of Care: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Patient Safety. 2021; 17 (5): 375-380. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000283.

Kripalani, S., Theobald, C. N., Anctil, B., & Vasilevskis, E. E. (2014). Reducing hospital readmission rates: current strategies and future directions. Annual review of medicine, 65, 471-485.

Morkisch, N., Upegui-Arango, L. D., Cardona, M. I., van den Heuvel, D., Rimmele, M., Sieber, C. C., & Freiberger, E. (2020). Components of the transitional care model (TCM) to reduce readmission in geriatric patients: a systematic review. BMC geriatrics, 20(1), 345. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01747-w

Weiss, A. J., & Jiang, H. J. (2021). Overview of clinical conditions with frequent and costly hospital readmissions by payer, 2018. HCUP Statistical Brief #278. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb278-Conditions-Frequent-Readmissions-By-Payer-2018.pdf

1.20 Types of Data Sources
1.25 Data Source Details

Medicare FFS claims data Part A and B and Medicare Enrollment Database.

 

This is a claims-based measure and the measure score is calculated automatically from 100% final-action claims; claims data are routinely generated during the delivery of care.  We did not encounter any difficulties with respect to data feasibility, reliability, or validity.